On Thursday 22 April 2010 2:28:26 pm Maxim Sobolev wrote: > John Baldwin wrote: > > On Thursday 22 April 2010 6:05:04 am Maxim Sobolev wrote: > >> Maxim Sobolev wrote: > >>> There is already a code to detect non-existing AT keyboard and avoid > >>> attaching atkbd to it. The code is i386-only at the moment, I am trying > >>> to figure out how to modify it so that it works on amd64 as well. > >> Looks like this huge delay is caused by the inb() being astonishingly > >> slow, which is not factored by the timeout routines. Reading keyboard > >> status port once takes about 0.003s! I am not sure if it's common > >> behaviour of the platform, or something specific to this particular > >> model. Do you know by any chance? > > > > Well, many BIOSes trigger an SMI# when doing inb/outb to the keyboard ports so > > they can emulate a PS/2 keyboard when a USB keyboard is inserted. Do you have > > any BIOS options related to the USB legacy compat? I know of the Nehalem > > systems I've seen they have a separate option for controlling port 60/64 > > emulation which we leave disabled by default. > > That makes sense. Unfortunately I don't have access to the BIOS > settings. This is a hosted system, and the provider keeps BIOS password > for themselves. > > I have a patch that fixes that issue by measuring status register > reading time first and then factoring it in the calculations of the > number of retries: > > http://sobomax.sippysoft.com/atkbdc.diff > > It also applies the same logic to detect broken/non-existing keyboard > controller to amd64 as we do to the i386. I'd appreciate if you can do a > review. Hmm, not all i386 CPUs that we support have a TSC. Is the change to atkbdc_isa.c sufficient to fix the hang? If so, I'd rather just commit that bit and leave out the read_delay changes. -- John BaldwinReceived on Thu Apr 22 2010 - 17:34:34 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:03 UTC