On 27 April 2010 10:01, Jeff Roberson <jroberson_at_jroberson.net> wrote: > On Mon, 26 Apr 2010, pluknet wrote: > >> On 26 April 2010 17:42, dikshie <dikshie_at_gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Jeff, >>> thanks for SUJ. >>> btw, why there is nan% utilization? and what does it mean? >>> -------------- >>> ** SU+J Recovering /dev/ad0s1g >>> ** Reading 33554432 byte journal from inode 4. >>> ** Building recovery table. >>> ** Resolving unreferenced inode list. >>> ** Processing journal entries. >>> ** 0 journal records in 0 bytes for nan% utilization <==== >>> ** Freed 0 inodes (0 dirs) 0 blocks, and 0 frags. >>> -------------- >>> >> >> That may be due to an empty journal (the only plausible version for me), >> so jrecs and jblocks are not updated. > > Yes, this is it exactly. It's a simple bug, I will post a fix in the next > few days. > > Thanks, > Jeff > While here, could you please look at my another su+j issue email? (to not create a new thread of the same thing). Thanks in advance. http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-all/2010-April/023303.html -- wbr, pluknetReceived on Tue Apr 27 2010 - 07:57:11 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:03 UTC