Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Maxim Sobolev <sobomax_at_FreeBSD.org> writes: >> Richard Tector <richardtector_at_thekeelecentre.com> writes: >>> Could I also add that the removal of ataraid would affect those >>> users who dual-boot with Windows and rely on the psuedo-raid >>> provided by most Intel chipsets to be able to share the same pair of >>> disks. >> Well, this won't be a problem if we have GEOM classes that can >> understand metadata created by the ATA RAID BIOS(es). > > Most pseudo-raid kit has nifty features like checksum offloading, > composite writes etc. which can improve performance considerably. You > can't access those from GEOM. Have you ever seen them documented? Does the need to specifically handle dozens of incompatible implementations with limited resources worth those (probably not major) benefits? -- Alexander MotinReceived on Tue Apr 27 2010 - 12:00:15 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:03 UTC