On 08/10/2010 19:48, jhell wrote: > On 08/10/2010 03:58, Adrian Chadd wrote: >> On 10 August 2010 15:51, Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd_at_gmail.com> wrote: >>> Hi everyone, >>> >>> I'm committing some updates to the if_ath and ath_hal code. >>> >>> I've just committed updates to the AR5416 register setup values. I'd >>> appreciate some testing by AR5416 users - eg macbook pro users - to >>> ensure this hasn't broken functionality. >> >> I've also started merging in general if_ath changes; so please test >> the ath code in -head and let me know if I've introduced any >> regressions. >> > > I have applied the following (r211136) to my local stable/8 branch and > has proven to be an improvement with no drawbacks. > > diff -r 7d9664d4ac99 sys/dev/ath/if_ath.c > --- a/sys/dev/ath/if_ath.c Tue Aug 10 16:41:55 2010 -0400 > +++ b/sys/dev/ath/if_ath.c Tue Aug 10 19:39:25 2010 -0400 > _at__at_ -5418,6 +5418,7 _at__at_ > longCal = (ticks - sc->sc_lastlongcal >= ath_longcalinterval*hz); > if (longCal) { > sc->sc_stats.ast_per_cal++; > + sc->sc_lastlongcal = ticks; > if (ath_hal_getrfgain(ah) == HAL_RFGAIN_NEED_CHANGE) { > /* > * Rfgain is out of bounds, reset the chip > _at__at_ -5466,7 +5467,6 _at__at_ > nextcal *= 10; > } else { > nextcal = ath_longcalinterval*hz; > - sc->sc_lastlongcal = ticks; > if (sc->sc_lastcalreset == 0) > sc->sc_lastcalreset = sc->sc_lastlongcal; > else if (ticks - sc->sc_lastcalreset >= > ath_resetcalinterval*hz) > > As for the rest I can not vouch for unless you give me a specific patch > to test but I am willing to merge from head to my local tree at any > given point in time if you can give some revisions you would like > tested. You "I believe" made it possible for me to use this card within > a week that I had reported it ~2007-2008 so I and my card are at your > disposal. > > > Thank you. > PS I should probably also say that I am on i386 stable/8 with the AR5416 -- jhell,vReceived on Tue Aug 10 2010 - 21:49:48 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:06 UTC