On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 01:43:16AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > Gabor, > > I hope at this point it goes without saying that I have a lot of respect > for the work you've done on BSD grep, and I've already told you that I > think you're very courageous for taking the project on. I've been > testing and evaluating it for some time now, and I think I've given it a > fair trial. You've done a fairly good job of responding to bug reports, > and I understand that the exposure BSD grep has received as the default > in HEAD has been very valuable in exposing additional areas that need > work. However, with all that in mind I am officially asking you to > please change the default in HEAD to GNU grep. (Note, I am _not_ asking > you to remove BSD grep from the tree, just to change the default.) > > My reason is simple, performance. While doing some portmaster work > recently I was regression testing some changes I made to the --index* > options and noticed that things were dramatically slower than the last > time I tested those features. Thinking that I had made a programming > mistake I dug into my code, and while the regexps that I was using could > be tuned for slightly better performance the problem was not in my code. > I then installed textproc/gnugrep to compare, and the differences were > very dramatic using a highly pessimized test case (finding a match on > the last line of INDEX). The script I used to test is at > http://people.freebsd.org/~dougb/grep-time-trial.sh.txt and a typical > result was: > > GNU grep > Elapsed time: 2 seconds > > BSD grep > Elapsed time: 47 seconds what about optimizing BSD grep instead?Received on Fri Aug 13 2010 - 07:08:33 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:06 UTC