On 18 Aug 2010, at 18:18, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Rui Paulo <rpaulo_at_gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> I've been chatting with the ICC ex-users and they seem to be ok with the removal of the ICC bits from share/mk and other places. >> The reason is that it doesn't work and no one has volunteered to fix it for many years. This seems to indicate that the interest in ICC is low. >> If there's anyone against this, speak now or forever be silent. :-) > > Later versions of icc are more gcc compliant aren't they? If so, > wouldn't this also be a non-issue to remove the bits, or are there > still some incompatibilities between gcc and icc that are worth > noting? I really don't know how compatible is the latest icc because no one ever updated the ports version. This is actually a hint that no one really uses this anymore. Regards, -- Rui PauloReceived on Wed Aug 18 2010 - 15:37:47 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:06 UTC