On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Garrett Cooper <gcooper_at_freebsd.org> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Rui Paulo <rpaulo_at_gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> I've been chatting with the ICC ex-users and they seem to be ok with the removal of the ICC bits from share/mk and other places. >> The reason is that it doesn't work and no one has volunteered to fix it for many years. This seems to indicate that the interest in ICC is low. >> If there's anyone against this, speak now or forever be silent. :-) > > Later versions of icc are more gcc compliant aren't they? If so, Sorry -- wrong term. s/compliant/compatible/ :). > wouldn't this also be a non-issue to remove the bits, or are there > still some incompatibilities between gcc and icc that are worth > noting? > Thanks, > -Garrett >Received on Wed Aug 18 2010 - 15:48:00 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:06 UTC