On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Dimitry Andric <dimitry_at_andric.com> wrote: > On 2010-08-18 19:37, Rui Paulo wrote: >> I really don't know how compatible is the latest icc because no one >> ever updated the ports version. This is actually a hint that no one >> really uses this anymore. > > I recently installed the port, which has icc 8.1, but it fails to > compile even simple C++ programs, because it cannot cope with the > libstdc++ headers from g++ 4.2.1. > > You have to do all kinds of tricks, such as installing the gcc 3.4.x > port, and pointing the Intel compiler to its libstdc++ headers and > libraries, or nothing will work. > > Updating that port to icc 11.1 is probably not a trivial task, and > making sure it compiles programs properly is even trickier... :) Yeah... I was referring to icc 11.x because of work that my old group was looking at doing back when I was working on Linux. Anything older than that probably has compatibility issues :). Thanks, -GarrettReceived on Wed Aug 18 2010 - 17:59:53 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:06 UTC