I didn't want to prolong this now mostly off-topic discussion too much, but: On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 06:00:54PM +0200, C. P. Ghost wrote: > +1 for a scheme shell, but not for the heavy-weight variety that > compiles to C, as that would tie them to a subset of ${ARCH}es. Why do you say that? Most of the C-generators that I know of produce fairly standards-compliant C code that should just work anywhere. Sure there are some (with sophisticated memory managers, mostly) that get intimate with the platform, but presumably we would have to stay away from those for this sort of exercise... Cheers, -- AndrewReceived on Thu Aug 19 2010 - 21:52:40 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:06 UTC