Re: Interpreted language(s) in the base

From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des_at_des.no>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 21:35:05 +0200

Gabor PALI <pgj_at_FreeBSD.org> writes:
> Sorry for chiming in, just a quick idea.  If you find the "get a
> high-level language that compiled to C" idea good,

I don't think it's a good idea, and I don't understand why this thread
seems stuck in that rut.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des_at_des.no

Received on Fri Aug 20 2010 - 17:35:06 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: John Baldwin: "Re: LOR on nfs: vfs_vnops.c:301 kern_descrip.c:1580"
Previous message: Dag-Erling Smørgrav: "Re: Interpreted language(s) in the base"
In reply to: Gabor PALI: "Re: Interpreted language(s) in the base"
Next in thread: Gabor PALI: "Re: Interpreted language(s) in the base"
Reply: Gabor PALI: "Re: Interpreted language(s) in the base"
Reply: Doug Barton: "Re: Interpreted language(s) in the base"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:06 UTC