On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 12:11:48 +0200 Gary Jennejohn <gljennjohn_at_googlemail.com> wrote: > On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:07:38 +0300 > Alexander Motin <mav_at_FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > > Gary Jennejohn wrote: > > > Hmm. I applied your patches and am now running the new kernel. But I > > > only installed the new kernel and didn't do make buildworld installworld. > > > > > > Mu systat -vm 1 doesn't look anything like yours. I'm seeing about 2300 > > > interrupts per second and most of those are coming from the hpet timers: > > > > > > 1122 hpet0:t0 > > > 1124 hpet0:t1 > > > > It means 1000Hz of hardclock (hz) events mixed with 127Hz of statclock > > (stathz) events. HPET timer here works in one-shot mode handling it. > > > > > So, what else did you do to reduce interrupts so much? > > > > > > Ah, I think I see it now. My desktop has only C1 enabled. Is that it? > > > Unfortunately, it appears that only C1 is supported :( > > > > Yes, as I have said, at this moment empty ticks skipped only while CPU > > is in C2/C3 states. In C1 state there is no way to handle lost events on > > wake up. While it may be not very dangerous, it is not very good. > > > > Too bad. I'd say that systems which are limited to C1 don't benefit > much (or not at all) from your changes. > OK, this is purely anecdotal, but I'll report it anyway. I was running pretty much all day with the patched kernel and things seemed to be working quite well. Then, after about 7 hours, everything just stopped. I had gkrellm running and noticed that it updated only when I moved the mouse. This behavior leads me to suspect that the timer interrupts had stopped working and the mouse interrupts were causing processes to get scheduled. Unfortunately, I wasn't able to get a dump and had to hit reset to recover. As I wrote above, this is only anecdotal, but I've never seen anything like this before applying the patches. -- Gary JennejohnReceived on Tue Aug 31 2010 - 06:29:22 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:06 UTC