On Tue Dec 14 10, Bruce Cran wrote: > On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 04:47:39 +0000 > "b. f." <bf1783_at_googlemail.com> wrote: > > > The last part of your patch reverts a change that Warner Losh made in > > r212525 as part of his tbemd project merge. It's possible that this > > change may have been an unintended, but it followed a discussion in > > which Warner rejected a related patch proposed by Garrett Cooper, > > partly because sysinstall is included in build-tools in Makefile.inc1, > > even though some thought that it should not be. In any event, you > > should probably look into that before committing the last part of your > > patch. > > I'm wondering if people might be surprised to find sade gone if they > set WITHOUT_SYSINSTALL - one's an installer, the other a partitioning > program. that's a good argument. so WITHOUT_SYSINSTALL mustn't affect sade. cheers. alex > > -- > Bruce Cran -- a13xReceived on Fri Dec 17 2010 - 13:33:32 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:10 UTC