Re: [dtrace] syscall provider naming convention.

From: Artem Belevich <fbsdlist_at_src.cx>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 01:26:00 -0800

On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 3:15 AM, Andriy Gapon <avg_at_freebsd.org> wrote:
> It would be nice to get the i386 counterpart too when this goes into the tree.

Here's updated version that has syscall:linux32 working on i386, too.

https://sites.google.com/site/abc678site/files/dt-systrace-20101221.patch.gz

--Artem

Received on Tue Dec 21 2010 - 08:52:37 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: FreeBSD Tinderbox: "[head tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64"
Previous message: Artem Belevich: "Re: [dtrace] syscall provider naming convention."
In reply to: Andriy Gapon: "[dtrace] syscall provider naming convention."
Next in thread: Artem Belevich: "Re: [dtrace] syscall provider naming convention."
Reply: Artem Belevich: "Re: [dtrace] syscall provider naming convention."

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:10 UTC