Gabor Kovesdan wrote: > El 2010. 02. 04. 11:31, Lucius Windschuh escribió: >> Hi Gabor, >> is there any chance that the BSD-licensed bc will get readline support >> or that you add a switch in math/gnubc to re-enable readline support? >> This i a huge enhancement if you use bc interactively. >> I know that libreadline is GPL-licensed. But maybe, there is an >> alternative. >> > Hi Lucius, > > I've just committed a change to compile math/gnubc with libedit. It > gives you the same and it is part of the base system. When I have sorted > out some of my another TODOs, I'll check how complicated it would be to > add libedit support to base bc. Hi, sorry to be OT. If libedit can be swapped for libreadline in the BSDL bc is it possible to swap them elsewhere? Of course kgdb gdb et al. will always be linked against libreadline but there were a few other tools people seemed surprised to find linked against readline. Under /usr/[s]bin: ntpdc, ntpq, kadmin, ktutil and under /sbin/: gvinum (?!). See this thread: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2009-February/002877.html The gvinum code seems like it would be more work but perhaps for someone familiar with libedit/libreadline issues ntpdc ntpq would be "low hanging fruit". A while back I was frequently building heimdal 1.1 from source, somehow linking against libedit (I assumed this was correct since I had not noticed the base heimdal tools were linked against libreadline). Everything worked fine with -ledit instead of -lreadline as far as I could tell. Under 8.0 heimdal in base has changed but it is still linked against readline even though the line editing prompt for kadmin seems fairly basic and libedit seems to work (BTW does ktutil even provide a line editing prompt?). There's probably good reasons for this but *perhaps* for kadmin/ktutil the fruit is not low hanging but already in the basket :) cheers,Received on Thu Feb 04 2010 - 15:17:20 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:00 UTC