Hi Ed: On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 12:03 AM, Ed Schouten <ed_at_80386.nl> wrote: > > * Vincent Poy <vincepoy_at_gmail.com> wrote: > > It appears that after utmpx.h gone into effect, ports/sysutils/screen and > > ports/sysutils/tmux are not working correctly after a updated ports tree > and > > building/installing the ports. What basically happens is the screen/tmux > > sessions which basically use tty's don't show up on the system in w, who, > > finger. > > I just rebuilt screen and doesn't seem to work indeed. The point is that > I wrote a perfectly fine patch for it and sent it to cy_at_, but he > committed a completely different version to the ports tree. You'd better > discuss this regression with him. > > My version did work: > > | (ed_at_dull) ~ $ tty > | /dev/pts/0 > | (ed_at_dull) ~ $ w > | 9:02AM up 5 days, 11:02, 1 user, load averages: 0.08, 0.08, 0.03 > | USER TTY FROM LOGIN_at_ IDLE WHAT > | ed pts/0 mekker.80386.nl 9:02AM - w > | (ed_at_dull) ~ $ screen > | (ed_at_dull) ~ $ tty > | /dev/pts/2 > | (ed_at_dull) ~ $ w > | 9:03AM up 5 days, 11:02, 1 user, load averages: 0.05, 0.08, 0.03 > | USER TTY FROM LOGIN_at_ IDLE WHAT > | ed pts/2 mekker:S.0 9:03AM - w Interesting, what's different between the patch you wrote vs the one cy_at_committed that's currently in the tree? Sorry about the false tmux alarm, I thought tmux would still show logins on the pty's for the sessions as it's supposed to be similar to screen. Cheers, Vince Vincent Poy, Ph.D. - AstrophysicsReceived on Tue Feb 09 2010 - 01:05:07 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:00 UTC