In message <429af92e1002081805l629e04c6ub7b85b77a492e22c_at_mail.gmail.com>, Vince nt Poy writes: > --000e0cd64914b56e6a047f215889 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Hi Ed: > > On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 12:03 AM, Ed Schouten <ed_at_80386.nl> wrote: > > > > > * Vincent Poy <vincepoy_at_gmail.com> wrote: > > > It appears that after utmpx.h gone into effect, ports/sysutils/screen and > > > ports/sysutils/tmux are not working correctly after a updated ports tree > > and > > > building/installing the ports. What basically happens is the screen/tmux > > > sessions which basically use tty's don't show up on the system in w, who, > > > finger. > > > > I just rebuilt screen and doesn't seem to work indeed. The point is that > > I wrote a perfectly fine patch for it and sent it to cy_at_, but he > > committed a completely different version to the ports tree. You'd better > > discuss this regression with him. > > > > My version did work: > > > > | (ed_at_dull) ~ $ tty > > | /dev/pts/0 > > | (ed_at_dull) ~ $ w > > | 9:02AM up 5 days, 11:02, 1 user, load averages: 0.08, 0.08, 0.03 > > | USER TTY FROM LOGIN_at_ IDLE WHAT > > | ed pts/0 mekker.80386.nl 9:02AM - w > > | (ed_at_dull) ~ $ screen > > | (ed_at_dull) ~ $ tty > > | /dev/pts/2 > > | (ed_at_dull) ~ $ w > > | 9:03AM up 5 days, 11:02, 1 user, load averages: 0.05, 0.08, 0.03 > > | USER TTY FROM LOGIN_at_ IDLE WHAT > > | ed pts/2 mekker:S.0 9:03AM - w > > > Interesting, what's different between the patch you wrote vs the one > cy_at_committed that's currently in the tree? Sorry about the false tmux > alarm, I > thought tmux would still show logins on the pty's for the sessions as it's > supposed to be similar to screen. Sorry, I managed to lose the patch. Thank goodness for ZFS snapshots. It should be working now. Tested on 7, 8, and 9. -- Cheers, Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert_at_komquats.com>Received on Tue Feb 09 2010 - 06:23:57 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:00 UTC