On Tuesday 23 February 2010 3:36:19 pm Brandon Gooch wrote: > On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 1:01 PM, John Baldwin <jhb_at_freebsd.org> wrote: > > On Tuesday 23 February 2010 12:36:31 pm Brandon Gooch wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:24 AM, John Baldwin <jhb_at_freebsd.org> wrote: > >> > On Tuesday 23 February 2010 10:28:49 am Brandon Gooch wrote: > >> >> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 7:29 AM, Andriy Gapon <avg_at_icyb.net.ua> wrote: > >> >> > on 23/02/2010 13:18 Renato Botelho said the following: > >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 7:35 PM, Chris Hedley > >> >> >> <freebsd-current_at_chrishedley.com> wrote: > >> >> > [snip] > >> >> >>> Do you have USB legacy support enabled in your BIOS? I'm not sure if > >> >> >>> there's an option for the loader to use USB devices natively, but the BIOS's > >> >> >>> legacy option where it provides AT/PS2 emulation is probably the easiest way > >> >> >>> to get the keyboard working. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Yes, I do, but it seems to be a regression on FreeBSD itself, I had this problem > >> >> >> in the past and I checked the same things i need to check in the past again and > >> >> >> everything is fine. > >> >> > > >> >> > A more precise way to state that would be "a regression in FreeBSD boot/loader". > >> >> > I think that you are referring to the issue that was fixed by r189017. > >> >> > It might be worthwhile investigating what was done in that revision and what > >> >> > happened in sys/boot code since then. > >> >> > > >> >> > One possibility is that your BIOS uses memory above 1MB for USB emulation, but > >> >> > doesn't mark that memory as used in system memory map. In that case that memory > >> >> > could be overwritten by the loader. If that's true then the blame is on the BIOS. > >> >> > Alternatively, our code might be parsing the system memory map incorrectly. > >> >> > But I am just making wild guesses here. > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> I don't know if it is at all related, but this commit has caused > >> >> problems for me booting at least one of my machines: > >> >> > >> >> http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base/head/sys/boot/i386/zfsboot/zfsboot.c?r1=199714&r2=200309 > >> >> > >> >> Commit message: > >> >> > >> >> Revision 200309 - (view) (annotate) - [select for diffs] > >> >> Modified Wed Dec 9 20:36:56 2009 UTC (2 months, 2 weeks ago) by jhb > >> >> File length: 24893 byte(s) > >> >> Diff to previous 199714 > >> >> - Port bios_getmem() from libi386 to {gpt,}zfsboot() and use it to > >> >> safely allocate a heap region above 1MB. This enables {gpt,}zfsboot() > >> >> to allocate much larger buffers than before. > >> >> - Use a larger buffer (1MB instead of 128K) for temporary ZFS buffers. This > >> >> allows more reliable reading of compressed files in a raidz/raidz2 pool. > >> >> > >> >> Submitted by: Matt Reimer mattjreimer of gmail > >> >> MFC after: 1 week > >> > > >> > Starting a new thread, which problems are you seeing with this change? ZFS is > >> > a good bit more memory hungry than UFS, so it really needs to use high memory > >> > for its heap. Also, I wonder if you still have problems if you use the older > >> > zfsboot with the newer zfsloader? Finally, you need to use disklabel - B or > >> > some such to update the zfsboot bits for this change to take effect. > >> > > >> > -- > >> > John Baldwin > >> > > >> > >> I filed a PR so it wouldn't fall through the cracks: > >> > >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=144234 > >> > >> I guess I tried a combination of various revisions of bootstrap code > >> and loaders when I first encountered the issue. It was when I wrote a > >> recent gptzfsboot to the geom that I saw the symptoms: > >> > >> error 1 lba 48 > >> error 1 lba 1 > >> No ZFS pools located, can't boot > >> > >> I just wound up using sys/boot/i386/zfsboot/zfsboot.c revision 199714 > >> to build a working gptzfsboot on another system and wrote that to the > >> disk to get the machine operational. > > > > Try this: > > > > Index: zfsboot.c > > =================================================================== > > --- zfsboot.c (revision 204207) > > +++ zfsboot.c (working copy) > > _at__at_ -467,6 +467,7 _at__at_ > > static inline void > > putc(int c) > > { > > + v86.ctl = 0; > > v86.addr = 0x10; > > v86.eax = 0xe00 | (c & 0xff); > > v86.ebx = 0x7; > > _at__at_ -617,6 +618,8 _at__at_ > > off_t off; > > struct dsk *dsk; > > > > + dmadat = (void *)(roundup2(__base + (int32_t)&_end, 0x10000) - __base); > > + > > bios_getmem(); > > > > if (high_heap_size > 0) { > > _at__at_ -627,9 +630,6 _at__at_ > > heap_end = (char *) PTOV(bios_basemem); > > } > > > > - dmadat = (void *)(roundup2(__base + (int32_t)&_end, 0x10000) - __base); > > - v86.ctl = V86_FLAGS; > > - > > dsk = malloc(sizeof(struct dsk)); > > dsk->drive = *(uint8_t *)PTOV(ARGS); > > dsk->type = dsk->drive & DRV_HARD ? TYPE_AD : TYPE_FD; > > _at__at_ -1157,6 +1157,7 _at__at_ > > * when no such key is pressed in reality. As far as I can tell, > > * this only happens shortly after a reboot. > > */ > > + v86.ctl = V86_FLAGS; > > v86.addr = 0x16; > > v86.eax = fn << 8; > > v86int(); > > > > -- > > John Baldwin > > > > It still breaks: > > error 1 lba 48 > error 1 lba 1 > No ZFS pools located, can't boot Ok. Can you add a printf to zfsboot.c to print out dsk->start in the case that you get an error? error 1 means that the BIOS thinks it got a bad parameter, presumably in the disk packet. If you wanted to be ambitious, just print out all of the fields in the packet when it fails. -- John BaldwinReceived on Tue Feb 23 2010 - 20:10:20 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:01 UTC