Jeff Roberson wrote: > Hello, > > I have been augmenting softupdates with a small journal that will be > processed in lieu of fsck in the event of a crash. I have written some > about this project here: http://jeffr_tech.livejournal.com/ Good news! > For now I need volunteers who will attempt to crash the kernel code. It > now passes fsx, fsstress, and stress2 on my box for many hours. pho_at_ > has been helping me and may still have a bug or two but I need a wider > audience so we can be comfortable with the stability. In a week or so I > will also provide the checker. Until then a full fsck is required after > a crash. Hi, Do you mean that journal replay/recovery is implemented but not 100% working yet so a fsck is needed or that it is still missing?Received on Sat Jan 09 2010 - 00:08:00 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:59 UTC