On Sat, 09.01.2010 at 17:39:18 +0100, Paul B Mahol wrote: > On 1/9/10, Ulrich Spoerlein <uqs_at_spoerlein.net> wrote: > > Dear all, > > > > as you may know the LLVM/clang project is also working on static code > > analysis [1] and they provide a very early, very alpha version of their > > checker. > > > > For a couple of weeks now, I'm running these scans on the FreeBSD head > > source code which spews out lots of "errors" and false positives, but > > occasionally it uncovers a real bug. > > > > The curious might want to take a peek at [2] and peruse the long list > > (~7000 for buildworld, ~1300 for buildkernel) of (false) positives. > > > > Cheers, > > Uli > > > > PS: what happened to the Coverity runs on FreeBSD? > > > > [1] http://clang-analyzer.llvm.org/ > > [2] https://www.spoerlein.net/scan-build/ > > _______________________________________________ > > > Why is kernel build with NO_MODULES ? > Code in modules but not in GENERIC is ignored. Thanks for pointing this out. This was initially done to cut down the runtime, but since I got faster hardware I will turn modules on for the next scan. Perhaps adding LINT would give even more coverage ... Regards, UliReceived on Sat Jan 09 2010 - 15:42:23 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:59 UTC