2010/1/10 Dmitriy Demidov <dima_bsd_at_inbox.lv>: > On Sunday 10 January 2010, pluknet wrote: >> After looking on line numbers I'd suggest you to check >> if you've applied the patch two times (so suj.c "duplicates" itself). >> [...] > cc -O0 -pipe -I/usr/src/sbin/fsck_ffs -I/usr/src/sbin/fsck_ffs/../mount -g -DRESCUE -std=gnu99 -fstack-protector -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -Wno-uninitialized -Wno-pointer-sign -c /usr/src/sbin/fsck_ffs/suj.c > cc1: warnings being treated as errors > /usr/src/sbin/fsck_ffs/suj.c:397: warning: 'ino_isfree' defined but not used > *** Error code 1 > You've patched correctly. The problem is in source itself: the ino_isfree() function was used in an earlier patch but #if 0'defed out in the current one. You should comment out ino_isfree() body to silent the compiler and try again. -- wbr, pluknetReceived on Sun Jan 10 2010 - 15:44:08 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:59 UTC