On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 11:07 PM, Wilkinson, Alex <alex.wilkinson_at_dsto.defence.gov.au> wrote: > > 0n Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 09:41:51PM +0800, Wilkinson, Alex wrote: > > > 0n Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 03:36:56PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > > > >on 13/01/2010 21:42 Ed Schouten said the following: > > >> Hello everyone, > > >> > > >> I just made various commits to FreeBSD HEAD to remove our old user > > >> accounting database interface (see utmp(5)) and replace it by the POSIX > > >> standardized utmpx interface (see getutxent(3)). > > some more port breakage /usr/ports/net-im/libpurple: > > /usr/include/utmp.h:2:2: error: #error "<utmp.h> has been replaced by <utmpx.h>" > gmake[5]: *** [libzephyr_la-Zinternal.lo] Error 1 > gmake[5]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net-im/libpurple/work/pidgin-2.6.5/libpurple/protocols/zephyr' The zephyr support in libpurple is incredibly ancient, and doesn't really work very well. I have a port prepared that packages libzephyr and the standard zephyr clients directly, in ports/141790 (though I have a couple of tweaks to the submitted version in my queue). I'd almost say it would be worth just ripping the zephyr support out of the libpurple port. -Ben KadukReceived on Tue Jan 19 2010 - 06:20:54 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:00 UTC