Re: avoid producing empty set_pcpu section [Was: elf obj load: skip zero-sized sections early]

From: Andriy Gapon <avg_at_freebsd.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 15:00:41 +0300
on 15/07/2010 14:39 Kostik Belousov said the following:
> 
> Is new behaviour completely identical to the behaviour of the newer
> ld ? 

No, it's not completely identical.
__start_SECNAME placement would be identical, but our ld would still assign the
symbol while latest upstream binutils PROVIDES it.

> Even if yes, I think that such changes make potential import of
> newer binutils harder.

How?

-- 
Andriy Gapon
Received on Thu Jul 15 2010 - 10:00:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:05 UTC