Bruce Cran wrote: > On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 11:47:23PM +0300, Alexander Motin wrote: >> It is probably hard to see pattern due to to very high clock frequency. >> But TSC timecounter is unreliable even on real SMP systems. What it >> counts on virtual SMP - even bigger question. As system seems never uses >> timecounters with negative quality - you've left with >> kern.timecounter.hardware=dummy - that's why time is not going. As last >> resort you may try to set sysctl kern.timecounter.hardware=TSC in run time. > > I came across the same problem on rootbsd a few days ago, and set the TSC > as the timecounter in /etc/sysctl.conf - I've since found it should be > possible to also set kern.timecounter.smp_tsc=1 in /boot/loader.conf to let > the TSC be chosen. The system's now been running for a day and I've not had > any warnings about the clock going backward, and since the time has > remained correct I guess Xen synchronises with the host? I have no idea about TSC in XEN, but QEMU just passes TSC from the physical CPU. So if host' TSCs are not synchronized - value may jump accidentally when QEMU process migrates between CPUs. > Should I still switch back to using the i8254? I would say it depends. i8254 frequency is always known, while TSC depends on calibration. Calibration on virtual machine I think much less precise then on physical. Same time, if i8254 also used as event timer, timestamp calculation algorithm is not very trivial there and I am not sure it is absolutely reliable. So I would probably used i8254 as time counter and LAPIC+RTC as event timers. -- Alexander MotinReceived on Fri Jul 16 2010 - 19:21:55 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:05 UTC