(unknown charset) Re: current + mpt = panic: Bad link elm 0xffffff80002d6480 next->prev != elm

From: (unknown charset) Marius Strobl <marius_at_alchemy.franken.de>
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 14:20:22 +0200
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 12:31:26PM +0200, Stle Kristoffersen wrote:
> On 2010-07-15 at 19:52, Ståle Kristoffersen wrote:
> > On 2010-07-15 at 18:00, Marius Strobl wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 02:34:23PM +0200, Stle Kristoffersen wrote:
> > > > Upgraded to from stable to current yesterday and very quickly received a
> > > > panic. It did however not dump it's core, so I was unable to debug it.
> > > > Today it did panic again, and I took a picture: (Sorry about the bad
> > > > quality)
> > > > 
> > > > http://folk.uio.no/stalk/mpt/IMG_1403.JPG
> > > > 
> > > > And from the backtrace:
> > > > http://folk.uio.no/stalk/mpt/IMG_1404.JPG
> > > > 
> > > > Both times I hade the mpt0: request timed out just before the panic.
> > > > 
> > > > I'm not sure why it's not dumping it's core (It was working under stable,
> > > > and I have dumpdev="AUTO" and dumpdir="/var/crash" in rc.conf)
> > > 
> > > What revision were you using?
> > 
> > Not sure exactly what revision I was using, is there an easy way to figure
> > that out? I ran cvsupdate around 13:00 CEST yesterday.
> > 
> > > Does using current as of r209598 make a difference?
> > 
> > Downgrading now...
> 
> And it crashed again, with current from r209598...
> 

Ok, this at least means that your problem isn't caused by the recent
changes to mpt(4) as the pre-r209599 version only differed from the
8-STABLE one in a cosmetic change at that time.

Marius
Received on Sun Jul 18 2010 - 10:20:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:05 UTC