On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 01:42:30PM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote: > Sorry, I misparsed ATA_CAM as ahci. Why on earth would anyone want to > use ATA_CAM these days? Well, I am not sure if you really meant ATA_CAM and not ATAPICAM? But in case you meant it, for people who do not use SATA-capable hardware, ATA_CAM is useful. This laptop may be no longer be the most recent model these days, but runs -CURRENT just fine most of the time. Also, if I remember correctly, for people with a bit more recent controllers ATA_CAM offers other advantages, but those do not affect me. So, for me ATA_CAM is just a better version of the ata(4) driver... -- Regards: Szilveszter ADAM Budapest HungaryReceived on Wed Jul 28 2010 - 23:13:42 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:05 UTC