Re: [TESTING]: ClangBSD branch needs testing before the import to HEAD

From: Garrett Cooper <yanefbsd_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 19:54:22 -0700
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Doug Barton <dougb_at_freebsd.org> wrote:
> On 05/31/10 17:46, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
>>
>> On 06/01/10 09:25, James R. Van Artsdalen wrote:
>> [snip interesting history]
>>
>>> I do suggest modifying the FreeBSD build process so that uname -a shows
>>> the compiler and its version for both the kernel and userland.
>>
>> Reading through this discussion, I wanted to draw attention to this
>> footnote in James' email. It sounds like a sensible and useful
>> suggestion that would go some way to addressing Kostik's concerns about
>> knowing whether a kernel bug report was related to a gcc or clang built
>> kernel.
>
> +1

I doubt there's anyone that would disagree with this. The only thing
that would be painful is if there were mixed compiles with
applications and triage, but if that was the case the user should
debug their own issue because they'd be mixing and matching toolchains
:/...
Thanks,
-Garrett
Received on Tue Jun 01 2010 - 00:54:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:04 UTC