Re: RFC: etcupdate tool in base?

From: Mike Jakubik <mike.jakubik_at_intertainservices.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 16:31:08 -0400
On 6/10/2010 2:47 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 10/06/2010 21:29 Eitan Adler said the following:
>    
>> -1 unless mergemaster is replaced.
> Have you tried etcupdate?
> etcupdate and mergemaster have a similar function but do things in quite a
> different way.  While one is intended to be more interactive, the other is more
> automated.  They can not replace each other.
>    
>

-1 Also.

How does this differ from a "mergemaster -iFU" ? That's pretty much as 
automated as it can get.
Received on Thu Jun 10 2010 - 18:31:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:04 UTC