Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wireless

AK-san,

PseudoCylon wrote:
>>>> From: Ganbold <ganbold_at_gmail.com>
>>>> To: PseudoCylon <moonlightakkiy_at_yahoo.ca>
>>>> Cc: freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org; Ganbold Tsagaankhuu <ganbold_at_mobicom.mn>
>>>> Sent: Thu, June 10, 2010 10:53:30 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wireless
>>>>
>>>> It seems like it is running without any problem so far, no more adsl
>>>> modem problem.
>>>> I can see arp packets in wlan0 interface as  well as in  macbook.
>>>> I will continue testing and let you know if there comes any problem.
>>>>
>>>> thanks again,
>>>>
>>>> Ganbold
>>>>    
>>>>         
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Glad to hear. It was an encryption problem. A client was dropping packets..
>>>
>>> Please let me know if you find another bug. (Hope there won't be)
>>>  
>>>       
>> Well, looks like I was too fast :(
>>
>> It seems like client is not receiving any arp packets when rspro doesn't
>> first initiate ping (maybe arp request) to client.
>> If I first ping to client from rspro, later on arp packets can be seen
>> on client.
>> When I ping from rspro to client, response is very different:
>>
>> # arp -a
>> ? (192.168.1.43) at 8e:fd:59:d6:3a:50 on bridge0 permanent [bridge]
>> ? (192.168.1.42) at 00:22:cf:03:e0:30 on wlan0 permanent [ethernet]
>> ? (192.168.1.41) at 00:15:6d:c1:c7:77 on arge0 permanent [ethernet]
>> ? (192.168.1.1) at 00:30:54:62:3d:24 on arge0 expires in 1200 seconds
>> [ethernet]
>> ? (192.168.1.7) at 00:1c:25:9d:36:1d on arge0 expires in 824 seconds
>> [ethernet]
>> # ping 192.168.1.50
>> PING 192.168.1.50 (192.168.1.50): 56 data bytes
>> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.50: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=2.694 ms
>> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.50: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=302.177 ms
>> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.50: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=1.041 ms
>> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.50: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=5234.417 ms
>> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.50: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=4225.060 ms
>> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.50: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=3214.908 ms
>> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.50: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=2207.241 ms
>> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.50: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=1197.061 ms
>> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.50: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=186.833 ms
>> ^C
>> --- 192.168.1.50 ping statistics ---
>> 11 packets transmitted, 9 packets received, 18.2% packet loss
>> round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 1.041/1841.270/5234.417/1870.962 ms
>> # arp -a          
>> ? (192.168.1.43) at 8e:fd:59:d6:3a:50 on bridge0 permanent [bridge]
>> ? (192.168.1.42) at 00:22:cf:03:e0:30 on wlan0 permanent [ethernet]
>> ? (192.168.1.41) at 00:15:6d:c1:c7:77 on arge0 permanent [ethernet]
>> ? (192.168.1.1) at 00:30:54:62:3d:24 on arge0 expires in 1183 seconds
>> [ethernet]
>> ? (192.168.1.7) at 00:1c:25:9d:36:1d on arge0 expires in 805 seconds
>> [ethernet]
>> ? (192.168.1.50) at 00:26:bb:17:f6:61 on arge0 expires in 1186 seconds
>> [ethernet]
>> # ping 192.168.1.50
>> PING 192.168.1.50 (192.168.1.50): 56 data bytes
>> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.50: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=1590.035 ms
>> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.50: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=580.201 ms
>> 64 bytes from 192.168.1.50: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=528.019 ms
>> ^C
>> --- 192.168.1.50 ping statistics ---
>> 5 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 40.0% packet loss
>> round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 528.019/899.418/1590.035/488.804 ms
>>
>>     
>
> Well, the patch is working (sort of). Old driver wouldn't let you ping anywhere.
>
> Replies are taking awfully long. One of them took 5 sec. This could be a different issue.
>
> Can you try a few thing? (Unfortunately, everything is working on my side.)
> * Before ping from rspro, does ping from macbook to 192.168.1.42 (wlan0) work?
>   

Just tested again, it doesn't work from macbook.

> * If you give IP address to only bridge0, does it make any difference?
>   

It makes no difference.

Ganbold


> * Does it make any difference if use rspro without 192.168.1.7 (if possible)?
>
> wlandebug doesn't work on macbook, does it?
>
> Can you show me your hostapd.conf (minus password, of course). I'll try with the same config.
>
> And, if you ping from macbook, would it take that long?
>
>
> AK
>
>   
>> Any idea?
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> Ganbold
>>     
>
>
>
>
>   


-- 
Optimist, n.: A bagpiper with a beeper.