On Jun 19, 2010, at 5:32 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 4:24 AM, Garrett Cooper <yanefbsd_at_gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 4:21 AM, oizs <oizs_at_freemail.hu> wrote: >>> Since I tested it on different kind of os's, and with at least 5 testing >>> applications, I don't think that would be the case. >>> >>> On 2010.06.19. 13:17, Garrett Cooper wrote: >>>> >>>> On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 2:58 AM, oizs<oizs_at_freemail.hu> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> I tried almost everything raid 0 1 5 10 with all kind of stripes >>>>> 32/64/128 >>>>> and settings direct io/cached/read-ahead/wt/wb/disk-cache but nothing >>>>> seems >>>>> to work. >>>>> I changed the card to another dell perc 5 which had an older firmware. >>>>> Tried >>>>> 4 kind of motherboards even tried changing the os to linux and windows >>>>> xp/7. >>>>> In windows I got some funny results 1.3MB/s with write-back and 150MB/s >>>>> reads with 5 disks in raid0. >>>>> I just wanted to have a hw raid with no problems since the motherboard >>>>> 88sx7042 and bsd did not like eachother. >>>>> >>>>> On 2010.06.19. 11:07, Svein Skogen (Listmail Account) wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 18.06.2010 01:50, oizs wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I've bought a Dell Perc 5/i because I couldn't make the onboard marvell >>>>>>> 88sx7042 work with 8.0/8.1 or current, but as lucky as I am, the best I >>>>>>> can do with 4x1.5tb samsung in raid5 is 60MB/s writes and 90MB/s reads, >>>>>>> with bbu/write-back/adaptive-read-ahead. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I was expecting at least twice of that, and I'm not sure what can I do >>>>>>> to get that speed. (I've read man 7 tuning with no success) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> As far as I know this controller should be as fast as on other systems. >>>>>>> (Freebsd.org mx1 has one of these cards.) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm hoping somebody on the list reads this and helps because I can't >>>>>>> afford to buy another card. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I've lost track of what actual boards Dell has OEMized to make the >>>>>> various PERCs, but if I remember somewhat correctly, the PERC5 is >>>>>> basically an LSI Megaraid SAS 8308elp with different labels and >>>>>> firmware? >>>>>> >>>>>> If so, I've got that exact controller (minus the dell labels and >>>>>> firmware) in my primary storage box here, and yes, you SHOULD be able to >>>>>> get more performance out of it. What's your strip sizes and logical disk >>>>>> layout? >>>>>> >>>>>> (I've got the same board running on 8x 1T5 Seagates in RAID5+0, and that >>>>>> setup easily pulls 5 times the values you're seeing, and by all logic >>>>>> you should see about half of what I'm seeing) >>>>>> >>>> >>>> Dumb question: are you sure that the problem that you're seeing isn't >>>> in fact inhibited by the application that you're getting `performance' >>>> results with? >> >> If your applications aren't well suited for your hardware's >> capabilities, then of course performance will be bad. > > Furthermore, if the performance applications and your use scenarios > are centered around reading, as opposed to writing, there is an option > within mficontrol and the mfi(4) interface where you can actually > enable read-ahead, instead of writeback (you unfortunately can't > enable both scenarios). I realize that this is an artificial > improvement in a way, but you should judge whether or not your > application will be doing more reading than writing in whatever > capacity it's doing... > > HTH, No, that doesn't help. I wrote the driver, and I have no flipping clue what you're talking about. ScottReceived on Sun Jun 20 2010 - 00:56:21 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:04 UTC