On 06/21/2010 12:25, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > jhell <jhell_at_dataix.net> writes: >> Sure, the only difference here is you just seem to have added >> cleandepend for extra added surety but is unneeded if the obj >> directory is assumed empty. > > Assumption is the mother of all f***ups. The mother of your particular > f***up is the assumption that all headers are in /usr/src/include. His return post confirmed it was a clean obj. Where did the rest of the answers go ? I have not had to deal with this since: r208258 | mm | 2010-05-18 05:59:09 -0400 (Tue, 18 May 2010) | 16 lines And have no way to test it out if it solves the problem but sure it could be worked through without the attitude & flames that you bring to this thread. > > DES Wow really! your getting that upset you have to start cussing. I just hope that because of your incorrect addition to what you say building the includes improperly is a f***up and being called out on, just like the other patch we've discussed that you so claim had two files in it that you can't own up to does not have anything to do with this. As to the point before you start pointing fingers as you are so gracious to do lately - The steps laid out are the steps I had once took to correct the similar problem. And I seem to be running on these systems fairly well mind you. If you would like to take your aggressions off-list Ill be more than willing to oblige. Praying for you, -- jhellReceived on Mon Jun 21 2010 - 14:57:15 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:04 UTC