Re: using cupsd instead of base lpr [was Re: [HEADS UP] Kernel modules don't work properly in FreeBSD 8.1-RC1 (solved)]

From: <perryh_at_pluto.rain.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2010 00:31:12 -0700

Gary Jennejohn <gljennjohn_at_googlemail.com> wrote:

> IMO if you're going to make the binaries in base non-executable
> you might just as well delete them.

The chmod is reversible without having to recover the base binaries
from somewhere.

Received on Sat Jun 26 2010 - 05:41:00 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: David Wolfskill: "Re: Use of boot0cfg to set boot slice broke between r209459 and r209502"
Previous message: Daniel Braniss: "Re: Use of boot0cfg to set boot slice broke between r209459 and r209502"
In reply to: Gary Jennejohn: "Re: using cupsd instead of base lpr [was Re: [HEADS UP] Kernel modules don't work properly in FreeBSD 8.1-RC1 (solved)]"
Next in thread: Andrew Reilly: "Re: using cupsd instead of base lpr [was Re: [HEADS UP] Kernel modules don't work properly in FreeBSD 8.1-RC1 (solved)]"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:05 UTC