In message: <401095.35021.qm_at_web59107.mail.re1.yahoo.com> paradox <ddkprog_at_yahoo.com> writes: : iam propose all the architecture move in a separate directory : as is done in openbsd and netbsd : : ie : #mkdir /usr/src/sys/arch : #mv -R /usr/src/sys/{amd64,arm,i386,ia64,mips,pc98,powerpc,sparc64,sun4v,xen,x86) /usr/src/sys/arch/ : : Would it ever done in freebsd? No. That ship sailed in 1995. Besides, it would be the mother of all bikesheds. Do we want to have a sys/cpu/{mips,x86,arm,etc} for CPU support and a sys/arch/$MACHINE for support for machines that use that, how does that interact with source doe that assumes certain things in machine/foo.h. Or do we want to have better organized sub-ports. Do we want to reorg config while we're at it, and what about modules. And sys/dev is too crowded, let's fix that too while we're at it. The end result: gridlock and nothing will happen. WarnerReceived on Thu Mar 04 2010 - 16:37:58 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:01 UTC