On 03/05/10 00:02, Rui Paulo wrote: > This code is fine from a quick review. It just needs a few style fixes. > We could probably start thinking about committing it. > I think thompsa_at_ already merged the non-host-ap version of run(4) to HEAD. I haven't had free time to look at this yet, but I'm impressed that this is getting looked at, as these radios are popping up on the market more and more. cheers, BMSReceived on Fri Mar 05 2010 - 08:27:20 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:01 UTC