On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 02:27:06PM +0300, Alex Keda wrote: > On 05.03.2010 14:16, Doug Rabson wrote: > >On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 14:10:43 +0300, Alex Keda<admin_at_lissyara.su> wrote: > > > >>On 05.03.2010 13:59, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >> > >>>In message<4B90E171.2040808_at_lissyara.su>, Alex Keda writes: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>then can a more correct name of the project or ClosedBSD or > >>>> > >ManagedBSD? > > > >>>>=) > >>>>or something abstract? > >>>> > >>>> > >>>You are free to use any other operating system of your choice, if you > >>>are not happy with FreeBSD. > >>> > >>>Don't let the door hit you on the way out. > >>> > >>> > >>I'm not going anywhere, not even hope for it =) > >>I'm trying to make FreeBSD a better, more logical. > >>Maybe that's not very successful, but judging by the number of > >>responses, it hurt many, and made to think even more people. > >> > >I think you misunderstand. Some of us old-timers have been having this > >discussion repeatedly for well over ten years. It always ends up the same > >way - a re-org might make the source tree marginally prettier but the > >consequences for long-term maintenance and supporting downstream > >contributors outweigh any possible benefit. Having the same conversation > >every two years with the same outcome gets annoying. > > > And the fact that this issue was raised with enviable regularity - not > make you think that it really needs to be done? And the fact that weighting the arguments always ends in the same result - not make you think that this really shouldn't be done? A calculation always ends in the same result until the variables changes. So far this hasn't happen, so there is no need to recalculate/rethink every now and then. -- B.Walter <bernd_at_bwct.de> http://www.bwct.de Modbus/TCP Ethernet I/O Baugruppen, ARM basierte FreeBSD Rechner uvm.Received on Fri Mar 05 2010 - 11:53:10 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:01 UTC