Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 11:16:41PM +0200, Ian FREISLICH wrote: > > Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > > > Thanks for the info. Frankly, I have no idea how to explain the > > > issue given that you have no heavy load. > > > > How many cores would be involved in handling the traffic and runnig > > PF rules on this machine? There are 4x > > CPU: Quad-Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 8354 (2194.51-MHz K8-class CPU) > > In this server. I'm also using carp extensively. > > > > pf(4) uses a single lock for processing, number of core would have > no much benefit. What's interesting is the effect on CPU utilisation and interrupt generation that net.inet.ip.fastforwarding has: net.inet.ip.fastforwarding=1 interrupt rate is around 10000/s per bce interface cpu 8.0% interrupt net.inet.ip.fastforwarding=0 interrupt rate is around 5000/s per bce interface cpu 13.0% interrupt It also appears to not drop packets, but I'll have to watch it for longer. Ian -- Ian FreislichReceived on Mon Mar 08 2010 - 13:45:27 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:01 UTC