On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 08:54:32PM -0700, Scott Long wrote: > On Mar 11, 2010, at 6:14 PM, Scot Hetzel wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Mike Jakubik > > <mike.jakubik_at_intertainservices.com> wrote: > >> On 3/11/2010 9:50 AM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > >>> > >>> As a result of importing 32-bit compatibility support for non-x86 64-bit > >>> platforms, the kernel options COMPAT_IA32 has been renamed > >>> COMPAT_FREEBSD32 in revision 205014, so all kernel configurations > >>> including this option must be modified accordingly. > >> > >> That sounds a bit confusing, compatibility with FreeBSD 3.2? > >> > > I agree that the name COMPAT_FREEBSD32 is confusing, does it mean > > compatiblity with FreeBSD 3.2, FreeBSD 32 or 32-bit ARCH's. > > > > A better name would have been COMPAT_ARCH32 or COMPAT_32BIT_ARCH. > > Seriously, this is being debated? FreeBSD 3.2? Is this a joke? > I caught the humor in the first couple of replies, but you sound > serious. Wow. Yes it is. Where was it discussed first? I do not see anything in my freebsd-arch or freebsd-current archive; or any other FreeBSD list. If there wasn't already a well established meaning to "COMPAT_FREEBSD" (grep for it in /usr/src/sys/conf/), there probably wouldn't be any real complaints. -- -- David (obrien_at_FreeBSD.org)Received on Fri Mar 12 2010 - 16:22:56 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:01 UTC