On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:02, Garance A Drosehn wrote: In Message: <p06240804c7c4248d6354_at_[128.113.24.47]> > At 12:59 PM -0600 3/12/10, Mark Linimon wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 09:22:55AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: >> > Yes it is. Where was it discussed first? I do not see anything >> > in my freebsd-arch or freebsd-current archive; or any other >> > FreeBSD list. >> >> http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4B971CA3.9090301 >> >> crossposted on amd64_at_, ia64_at_, emulation_at_. > > > While those are logical mailing lists for this topic to have come > up on, it shouldn't be much of a surprise that there are many > freebsd users and committers who are not on those lists. Many > people who do know about the existing COMPAT_FREEBSD* variables, > and thus will be surprised at this variable name. > > My understanding is that there has already been a lot of furor > over this name, so let me first say I don't mean to infuriate > anyone. However, my own vote would be for some other name than > COMPAT_FREEBSD32. > > Perhaps COMPAT_ELF32 would be more well suited for this ? $0.002 -- jhellReceived on Wed Mar 17 2010 - 11:21:31 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:01 UTC