On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Alexander Best <alexbestms_at_wwu.de> wrote: > ok. i think i finally solved this riddle. the cause for the problem seems to > have been my CPUTYPE in /etc/make.conf. it is set to 'native'. actually i've > been using the 'native' keyword for years now and never had any problems with > it, but it seems a recent commit broke 'native' as CPUTYPE. for me this is > 100% reproducable: > > 1. put 'CPUTYPE = native' in /etc/make.conf > 2. build and install gnu/usr.bin/cc > 3. do 'buildkernel' or 'buildworld' and observe the segfault. for some reason > this always occurs in lib/libc/string/strlen.c (r205108). i've tested this > with older version of libc.so (built 22. Feb) and got the same result. so i > assume this is not a libc problem, but a problem with gcc tripping over some > code in libc. i have no clue however why this happend just now and not > earlier. i don't think there has been a recent commit to gcc. > > to solve this there are two ways: > > 1. set CPUTYPE to 'nocona' (i'm running amd64). this will let you compile > everything just fine even with a gcc that has itself been built with 'CPUTYPE > = native'. > 2. build and install gnu/usr.bin/cc with 'CPUTYPE = nocona'. the gcc version > that has been built this way will compile everything just fine even with > 'CPUTYPE = native'. the only way to break this is to go and compile gcc again > with the CPUTYPE set to 'native'. > > so to summarize: compiling gnu/usr.bin/cc with CPUTYPE set to 'native' will > give you a broken gcc! What does -march=native yield in your case? There haven't been any recent commits to gcc, so I'm not sure whether or not that's the issue. The libraries that I provided could have just been built from a sane system -- maybe it's something else that needs to be explored a bit more closely to root cause the issue. Cheers, -GarrettReceived on Sun Mar 21 2010 - 03:48:00 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:01 UTC