Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wireless

PseudoCylon wrote:
> ----- Original Message ----
>
>   
>> From: Ganbold <ganbold_at_gmail.com>
>> To: PseudoCylon <moonlightakkiy_at_yahoo.ca>
>> Cc: freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org
>> Sent: Sat, March 27, 2010 7:01:32 AM
>> Subject: Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wireless
>>
>> JFYI, I have just tested if_run and works fine on HEAD (i386).
>> But on RouterStation Pro it still has problem with your patch.
>>     
>
>   
>> Ganbold
>>     
>
> Thank you for taking extra time to test the driver.
>
> Yes, it works on x86. It's hard to find bugs if everything is working on my computers (core2 and atom 330).
>
> Here is patch.
> http://dev.nasreddine.com/gitweb/?p=run.git;a=tree;f=dev/usb/wlan;h=695689599706b01ed9ef0f1be8dfc5790076e1ae;hb=bdc7558bfbd4f3b1c4491cb56853de24580a5434
> Please download if_run.c and if_runvar.h (click "raw" to download)
>
> It will print out lots of messages. Please show me last 5 or so messages if it still panics.
>
> Does stock run(4) still works on RouterStation? There were some update (r205042). Yours (r205084) has it.
>   

Does stock run(4) support hostap mode yet?

rspro# sysctl net.wlan.debug=1
net.wlan.debug: 0 -> 1
rspro# ifconfig wlan0 create wlandev run0 wlanmode hostap ssid bsd mode 11g
wlan0: Ethernet address: 00:22:cf:03:e0:30
Trap cause = 2 (TLB miss (load or instr. fetch) - kernel mode)
[ thread pid 1213 tid 100051 ]
Stopped at      strlcpy+0x14:   lb      v0,0(a1)
db> bt
Tracing pid 1213 tid 100051 td 0xc0f1d720
db_trace_thread+30 (?,?,?,?) ra 80071160 sp c7ed7450 sz 24
80071044+11c (0,?,ffffffff,?) ra 80070b54 sp c7ed7468 sz 32
800707c0+394 (?,?,?,?) ra 80070ce4 sp c7ed7488 sz 168
db_command_loop+78 (?,?,?,?) ra 800733b8 sp c7ed7530 sz 24
800732b0+108 (?,?,?,?) ra 801d8d4c sp c7ed7548 sz 424
kdb_trap+10c (?,?,?,?) ra 803c37f0 sp c7ed76f0 sz 32
trap+134c (?,?,?,?) ra 803baa58 sp c7ed7710 sz 176
MipsKernGenException+10c (c7ed7a66,0,8,c7ed7a54) ra 8025e6e4 sp c7ed77c0
sz 200
strlcpy+14 (?,?,?,?) ra 0 sp c7ed7888 sz 0
pid 1213
db>

Ganbold

> AK
>
>
>       __________________________________________________________________
> Yahoo! Canada Toolbar: Search from anywhere on the web, and bookmark your favourite sites. Download it now
> http://ca.toolbar.yahoo.com.
>
>   


-- 
The temperature of Heaven can be rather accurately computed from
available data. Our authority is Isaiah 30:26, "Moreover, the light of
the Moon shall be as the light of the Sun and the light of the Sun shall
be sevenfold, as the light of seven days." Thus Heaven receives from the
Moon as much radiation as we do from the Sun, and in addition seven
times seven (49) times as much as the Earth does from the Sun, or fifty
times in all. The light we receive from the Moon is one ten-thousandth
of the light we receive from the Sun, so we can ignore that. With these
data we can compute the temperature of Heaven. The radiation falling on
Heaven will heat it to the point where the heat lost by radiation is
just equal to the heat received by radiation, i.e., Heaven loses fifty
times as much heat as the Earth by radiation. Using the Stefan-Boltzmann
law for radiation, (H/E)^4 = 50, where E is the absolute temperature of
the earth (~300K), gives H as 798K (525C). The exact temperature of Hell
cannot be computed, but it must be less than 444.6C, the temperature at
which brimstone or sulphur changes from a liquid to a gas. Revelations
21:8 says "But the fearful, and unbelieving ... shall have their part in
the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone." A lake of molten
brimstone means that its temperature must be at or below the boiling
point, or 444.6C (Above this point it would be a vapor, not a lake.) We
have, then, that Heaven, at 525C is hotter than Hell at 445C. --
"Applied Optics", vol. 11, A14, 1972