Re: [head tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

From: TAKAHASHI Yoshihiro <nyan_at_jp.FreeBSD.org>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 20:12:08 +0900 (JST)
In article <AANLkTil9k6sbVTLpu_-Hk_q3HxQybSkeuX5JuoFBz4Dv_at_mail.gmail.com>
pluknet <pluknet_at_gmail.com> writes:

> Just wonder why apic is still commented out in pc98's GENERIC.
> Is there a reason to keep things intact?
> It was inherited from i386 port in time when it was commented out.

Because, most of pc98 does not have APIC.  In addition, SMP support on
pc98 is broken.

---
TAKAHASHI Yoshihiro <nyan_at_jp.FreeBSD.org>
Received on Wed May 26 2010 - 09:12:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:03 UTC