Re: wpa_supplicant gets points for trying, I suppose....

From: Bernhard Schmidt <bschmidt_at_freebsd.org>
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 08:40:54 +0100
On Monday, November 01, 2010 23:32:49 Paul B Mahol wrote:
> On 11/1/10, David Wolfskill <david_at_catwhisker.org> wrote:
> > FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #31 r214621M
> > 
> > Nov  1 15:09:40 d130 wpa_supplicant[569]: Failed to initiate AP scan.
> > Nov  1 15:10:10 d130 last message repeated 3 times
> > Nov  1 15:10:50 d130 last message repeated 4 times
> > ...
> > Nov  1 15:11:00 d130 wpa_supplicant[569]: Failed to initiate AP scan.
> > Nov  1 15:11:10 d130 wpa_supplicant[569]: Failed to initiate AP scan.
> > ...
> > Nov  1 15:11:20 d130 wpa_supplicant[569]: Failed to initiate AP scan.
> > Nov  1 15:11:30 d130 wpa_supplicant[569]: Failed to initiate AP scan.
> > ...
> > Nov  1 15:11:40 d130 wpa_supplicant[569]: Failed to initiate AP scan.
> > ...
> > Nov  1 15:11:50 d130 wpa_supplicant[569]: Failed to initiate AP scan.
> > Nov  1 15:12:10 d130 last message repeated 2 times
> > Nov  1 15:14:10 d130 last message repeated 12 times
> > 
> > I have the switch on this laptop in position to disable the wireless
> > device (iwn(4)).  Is there some way wpa_supplicant (or something) might
> > be able to recognize that this is a pointless exercise?
> 
> Well iwn could bring device down when radio is turned off and
> bring it up when radio is turned on ???

Well, that should actually be the case. I don't see how it might differ 
between stable/8 and head.

Can you post the output of
wpa_supplicant -Dbsd -iwlan0 -c/etc/wpa_supplicant.conf -d
while the RF kill button is in disabled state?

> > I don't recall stable/8 doing this, though I could be wrong.

-- 
Bernhard
Received on Tue Nov 02 2010 - 07:05:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:08 UTC