Re: [RFC] Outline of USB process integration in the kernel taskqueue system

On Thursday 04 November 2010 20:01:57 Matthew Fleming wrote:
> For the purpose of speed, I'm not opposed to breaking the KBI by using
> a doubly-linked TAILQ, but I don't think the difference will matter
> all that often (perhaps I'm wrong and some taskqueues have dozens of
> pending tasks?)

Hi,

In my case we are talking about 10-15 tasks at maximum. But still (10*9) / 2 = 
45 iterations is much more than 2 steps to do the unlink. Anyway. I will have 
a look at your work and suggest a new patch for my needs.

--HPS