Re: utmpx

From: Mark Linimon <linimon_at_lonesome.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 12:32:35 +0000

On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 01:09:06PM +0100, Ed Schouten wrote:
> It should be noted that that list is a bit pessimistic, since various
> ports have been fixed in the mean time.

Updates welcomed :-)

mcl

Received on Fri Nov 05 2010 - 11:49:09 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: John Baldwin: "Re: [RFC] Outline of USB process integration in the kernel taskqueue system"
Previous message: Ed Schouten: "Re: utmpx"
In reply to: Ed Schouten: "Re: utmpx"
Next in thread: Renato Botelho: "Re: utmpx"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:08 UTC