Re: [RFC] Outline of USB process integration in the kernel taskqueue system

From: Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky_at_c2i.net>
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 19:45:51 +0100
On Friday 05 November 2010 19:39:45 Matthew Fleming wrote:
> True, but no taskqueue(9) code can handle that.  Only the caller can
> prevent a task from becoming enqueued again.  The same issue exists
> with taskqueue_drain().

I find that strange, because that means if I queue a task again while it is 
running, then I doesn't get run? Are you really sure?

--HPS
Received on Fri Nov 05 2010 - 17:44:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:08 UTC