Re: [RFC] Outline of USB process integration in the kernel taskqueue system

From: Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky_at_c2i.net>
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 20:00:37 +0100
On Friday 05 November 2010 19:48:05 Matthew Fleming wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky_at_c2i.net> 
wrote:
> > On Friday 05 November 2010 19:39:45 Matthew Fleming wrote:
> >> True, but no taskqueue(9) code can handle that.  Only the caller can
> >> prevent a task from becoming enqueued again.  The same issue exists
> >> with taskqueue_drain().
> > 
> > I find that strange, because that means if I queue a task again while it
> > is running, then I doesn't get run? Are you really sure?
> 
> If a task is currently running when enqueued, the task struct will be
> re-enqueued to the taskqueue.  When that task comes up as the head of
> the queue, it will be run again.

Right, and the taskqueue_cancel has to cancel in that state to, but it doesn't 
because it only checks pending if !running() :-) ??

--HPS
Received on Fri Nov 05 2010 - 17:59:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:08 UTC