Re: Sense fetching [Was: cdrtools /devel ...]

On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 08:50:49PM +0200, Alexander Motin wrote:
> Hi.
> 
> I've reviewed tests that scgcheck does to SCSI subsystem. It shown
> combination of several issues in both CAM, ahci(4) and cdrtools itself.
> Several small patches allow us to pass most of that tests:
> http://people.freebsd.org/~mav/sense/
> 
> ahci_resid.patch: Add support for reporting residual length on data
> underrun. SCSI commands often returns results shorter then expected.
> Returned value allows application to know/check how much data it really
> has. It is also important for sense fetching, as ATAPI and USB devices
> return sense as data in response to REQUEST_SENSE command.
> 
> sense_resid.patch: When manually requesting sense data (ATAPI or USB),
> request only as much data as user requested (not the fixed structure
> size), and return respective sense residual length.
> 
> pass_autosence.patch: Unless CAM_DIS_AUTOSENSE is set, always fetch
> sense if not done by SIM, independently of CAM_PASS_ERR_RECOVER. As soon
> as device freeze released before returning to user-level, user-level
> application by definition can't reliably fetch sense data if some other
> application (like hald) tries to access device same time.
> 
> cdrtools.patch: Make libscg (part of cdrtools) on FreeBSD to submit
> wanted sense length to CAM and do not clear sense return buffer. It is
> mostly cosmetics, important probably only for scgcheck.

Please don't commit this to the port directly but let it loop back
via upstream (CC'ed) instead, otherwise we would need to obey the
following, which is undesirable, especially if these really are
mostly cosmetic issues:
/*
 *      Warning: you may change this source, but if you do that
 *      you need to change the _scg_version and _scg_auth* string below.
 *      You may not return "schily" for an SCG_AUTHOR request anymore.
 *      Choose your name instead of "schily" and make clear that the version
 *      string is related to a modified source.
 */

> 
> Testers and reviewers welcome. I am especially interested in opinion
> about pass_autosence.patch -- may be we should lower sense fetching even
> deeper, to make it work for all cam_periph_runccb() consumers.
> 

Marius