On Sun, 07.11.2010 at 17:18:43 +0000, Tony Finch wrote: > > this is about importing unifdef 2.4, which has no significant code > > changes, but that's not the point. > > I maintain unifdef and I haven't imported 2.4 because there are no code > changes. Please leave it alone. As I wrote, that's beside the point and not the question at hand. How/where should it end up in our tree? Is it vendor code? Is it contrib code? And if so how to bootstrap the correct subversion history ... UliReceived on Sun Nov 07 2010 - 20:29:23 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:08 UTC