Re: groff build failure

From: David O'Brien <obrien_at_FreeBSD.org>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 18:41:31 -0800
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 05:11:19PM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> Tinderbox agrees :(...

TB --- 2010-11-08 23:15:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2010-11-08 23:15:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
TB --- 2010-11-08 23:15:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2010-11-08 23:15:10 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2010-11-08 23:15:10 - /usr/bin/csup -z -r 3 -g -L 1 -h cvsup.sentex.ca /tinderbox/HEAD/amd64/amd64/supfile

Why is the tinderbox still using CVS source trees?  To some degree the
tinderbox agreeing is meaningless as the report from it does not give
the GRN[*] the sources are based on.

[*] specifically the output of:   svn info | grep 'Last Changed Rev:'

-- 
-- David  (obrien_at_FreeBSD.org)
Received on Tue Nov 09 2010 - 01:41:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:09 UTC