On Tuesday, November 16, 2010 7:20:47 am Andriy Gapon wrote: > > taskqueue_create() documentation never explicitly says this, but current > taskqueue_create() implementation just stores a 'name' pointer parameter > internally. Thus it depends on the 'name' having a life time encompassing that of > the taskqueue. > I think that alternatively we could have copied the name (or a portion of it) into > an internal buffer. > I don't any argument for either approach, just curious which one looks more > preferable from general (FreeBSD, kernel) programming practices point of view. Hmm, in many other places we store a separate copy (e.g. all the interrupt code uses separate MAXCOMLEN char arrays to hold names). If that is easy to do, that is probably the best approach. -- John BaldwinReceived on Tue Nov 16 2010 - 12:29:34 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:09 UTC