On Friday, November 19, 2010 11:20:04 am Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 16/11/2010 15:27 John Baldwin said the following: > > On Tuesday, November 16, 2010 7:20:47 am Andriy Gapon wrote: > >> > >> taskqueue_create() documentation never explicitly says this, but current > >> taskqueue_create() implementation just stores a 'name' pointer parameter > >> internally. Thus it depends on the 'name' having a life time encompassing that of > >> the taskqueue. > >> I think that alternatively we could have copied the name (or a portion of it) into > >> an internal buffer. > >> I don't any argument for either approach, just curious which one looks more > >> preferable from general (FreeBSD, kernel) programming practices point of view. > > > > Hmm, in many other places we store a separate copy (e.g. all the interrupt > > code uses separate MAXCOMLEN char arrays to hold names). If that is easy to > > do, that is probably the best approach. > > BTW, tq_name doesn't seem to be used anywhere at all. > Perhaps just drop it? But still could be useful in a debugger, though. If it's not used anywhere I would just drop it. -- John BaldwinReceived on Fri Nov 19 2010 - 17:05:47 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:09 UTC